roman

Ok. Here's the Final. #1 Clinton-Kucinich#2 Biden#3 Dodd#4 Richardson#5 Obama#6 Edwards Clinton- Senator Clinton walking in with the most to lose due to her lead and due to that she flubbed the last debate walked in fairly confidently considering the pressure of a back to back lose which could have cost her dearly. Her early "Asbestos" quip was a gamble. If she did well it would indeed be a "ha ha" which would reinforce her lead and initial confidence. If she flubbed again her own quip would have flung her into Gravel status. Clinton did not have the best line of the night but she had the most:"I'm not being attacked because I'm a Woman. I'm being attacked because I'm ahead.""I'm not playing the gender Card I'm trying to play the winning card."Slapping down Edwards with "Slinging mud right out of the Republican playbook."(From which Edwards never recovered)"NAFTA did not do as it was hoped." Ok. Lame. But she said it. On Kyl-Lieberman Clinton said EXACTLY what I stated in my post a few days ago."Aggressive diplomacy thru strength"On drivers licenses for illegal's she said "No" (Which I disagree with but who am I but a big mouth who thinks he's right all the time. {stick out tongue here} )She hurt herself here but with who?? Illegal's don't vote. With the legal immigrants? Quite possibly yes. By the same token this helped her with Republicans and Republican leaning Independents.(Which is exactly why I think she will pick Richardson as VP as stated in my post some days ago.) Kucinich- I Knew this guy was good. He got the most memorable line of the night of course. "Because I read it"Referring to the Patriot act of course. Then he proceeded to "slam" Edwards with the China trade deal "take responsibility,as a trial lawyer you knew better." Edwards was down for the count after this. (if he got a "slap" before this was the KO)He pulled no punches and stated his positions clearly. He did not seem all to happy up there either. Which strangely gave him even more credibility by looking disgusted with the other candidates. The only candidate who would not vote for the Dem nominee "Unless they would not use war as a policy"This guy couldn't have had a better night. NO UFO'S. Biden- This is the Guy that also came on cheerful jovial not a care in the world. Why?? Because he had NOTHING to lose. And he was total "Joe"Along with the easy going mode he was in he spoke with authority due to his experience. This guy knew what he was talking about. And the only one who calmly as-a-matter-of-factly countered Kucinich on the damage of the Patriot Act like he was saying "good morning." Leaving me with the feeling of "Presidential." Dodd- Dodd laid out what Dem's need to do to win the White House and keep the House and Senate. Effective on Unity. With the time he did get he spoke very well and very well in Spanish. While it was impressive somehow it just wasn't the big bang. He spoke with Authority but also with anger. Although I'm not sure at what. Is it just the way he speaks??He was effective. Anyone remember him today?? Richardson- "My name is Bill Richardson" ---Did the trick !! Ingratiating and approachable. He was strong on education. He was for DL "for" illegal's. And was "for" Hero cards for Veterans. Which left me wondering about everyone else. That's a lot of people to leave out. Environment yada yada. .... Gore. Reminded me of Gore. Plus or minus? up to you!! Obama-Next is Obama which has only moved up because Edwards moved down. This was the biggest surprise for both supporters and critics alike. If anyone "lost" the debate this is it. Coming in with the loudest applause. Senator Obama was one of the two boo-ed for going negative on Clinton. (uh-oh Iowa) The attempt was there. It just didn't come thru. Hemming and hawing all the things he was accusing of but not being accused of until now. The only effective point he made was on the China trade policy. " Why isn't the U. S insisting on our inspectors inspecting over in China? Like Japan is."On social security was a valiant attempt but just did not break the glass ceiling. Hold on!! When he said he wanted to "build schools in the Middle East" I fell off my chair!HUH?? Economy bad. Debt up to eyeballs no oil dividend a "money pit" war housing market. 37 million Americans starving! AND he's going to build schools in the Middle East?For the guys that would love to bring us....9-11......9-12....9-13.....9-14----9-15 etc. ????Looks like the Naive thing is not gone today. Want to know why I'm not going into his mixed energy policy??Exactly ! Why? Edwards- Was he even there? After he was slapped down with his own "mud"His "attack strategy backfired. Not only for himself but for Obama. After this his answers seemed "canned" The last nail in this coffin tonight was the boo. TrueBlue

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://romanaleksander.blogspot.com/2007/11/analysis-final.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Everyone change out your this pass for England as the toad desire Chelsea boss is 100% backing his home nation despite his boss Roman Abramovich paying the wages of the opposition. Israel's most handsome toad apparently has been sunning it up in Israel all week and has told his nation's "footballers" to be those Ruskies. Presumably Grant is really desperate for an Israel win to alter Hiddink be bad and stop never ending speculation that he's about to take up his job at any moment. Grant apparently cancelled a trip to Kenya (Kenya? What the hell is he doing in Kenya?) to pay time in his home country and is expected to be joined by Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich as come up as other prominent figures from Russian and Israeli football in Tel-Aviv for the be. Came straight to this summon? tour for all the latest news. If you’ve enjoyed feasting on Chelsea Pies then you’ll love the best obtain of football news views and speak in the blogosphere! Posted by Lee Coan on November 16. 2007 2:38 PM in | | | | TrackBack URL for this entry:http://shinymedia headshift com/cgi-bin/mtshiny/mt-tb fcgi/67465 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference : In all fairness to Grant. He had to support his country lest he is labelled a traitor by Israel. Money should not alter you forget where you are from. What is do by with Kenya???? Kenya just desire the rest of Africa is not as bad as you think. Posted by: Bumali | November 19. 2007 10:25 AM

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.chelseapies.tv/2007/11/avram_grant_lands_in_israel_to.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Everyone crack out your this weekend for England as the toad like Chelsea impress is 100% backing his domiciliate nation despite his boss Roman Abramovich paying the wages of the opposition. Israel's most handsome toad apparently has been sunning it up in Israel all week and has told his nation's "footballers" to be those Ruskies. Presumably Grant is really desperate for an Israel win to make Hiddink be bad and forbid never ending speculation that he's about to take up his job at any moment. Grant apparently cancelled a trip to Kenya (Kenya? What the hell is he doing in Kenya?) to spend measure in his home country and is expected to be joined by Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich as come up as other prominent figures from Russian and Israeli football in Tel-Aviv for the match. Came straight to this page? tour for all the latest news. If you’ve enjoyed feasting on Chelsea Pies then you’ll love the best source of football news views and gossip in the blogosphere! Posted by Lee Coan on November 16. 2007 2:38 PM in | | | | TrackBack URL for this entry:http://shinymedia headshift com/cgi-bin/mtshiny/mt-tb fcgi/67465 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference : In all fairness to Grant. He had to support his country lest he is labelled a traitor by Israel. Money should not alter you drop where you are from. What is wrong with Kenya???? Kenya just like the rest of Africa is not as bad as you think. Posted by: Bumali | November 19. 2007 10:25 AM

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.chelseapies.tv/2007/11/avram_grant_lands_in_israel_to.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Everyone crack out your this weekend for England as the toad desire Chelsea boss is 100% backing his home nation despite his boss Roman Abramovich paying the wages of the opposition. Israel's most handsome toad apparently has been sunning it up in Israel all week and has told his nation's "footballers" to be those Ruskies. Presumably Grant is really desperate for an Israel win to make Hiddink look bad and forbid never ending speculation that he's about to snaffle up his job at any moment. give apparently cancelled a move to Kenya (Kenya? What the hell is he doing in Kenya?) to spend measure in his home country and is expected to be joined by Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich as well as other prominent figures from Russian and Israeli football in Tel-Aviv for the be. Came straight to this page? Visit for all the latest news. If you’ve enjoyed feasting on Chelsea Pies then you’ll like the best obtain of football news views and speak in the blogosphere! Posted by Lee Coan on November 16. 2007 2:38 PM in | | | | TrackBack URL for this entry:http://shinymedia headshift com/cgi-bin/mtshiny/mt-tb fcgi/67465 Listed below are links to weblogs that compose : In all fairness to Grant. He had to give his country lest he is labelled a traitor by Israel. Money should not alter you drop where you are from. What is wrong with Kenya???? Kenya just desire the rest of Africa is not as bad as you think. Posted by: Bumali | November 19. 2007 10:25 AM

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.chelseapies.tv/2007/11/avram_grant_lands_in_israel_to.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

"Dollar denial" that express of willful blindness in which bankers and central bankers affirm not to be worried about America's seems to be ending. Now even the European Central Bank governor Jean Claude Trichet has the emit of concern. When the euro was launched the US dollar-euro transfer rate stood at $1.16/€1. At that price the dollar was undervalued by roughly 10% relative to its purchasing power parity (PPP). Initially the dollar's determine rose but since 2002 it has for the most move fallen steadily. Every day seems to bring a against the euro. In the approach of the dollar's ongoing fall policymakers undergo seemed paralysed. The reasons for inaction are many but it is difficult to avoid the impression that they are related to the current express of academic theorising about transfer rates. Simply put economists accept either that nothing should be done or that nothing can be done. Their so-called "rational expectations models" predict that exchange rates should not deviate from parity in any lasting way. Believing that they undergo open a way to model how currency traders think they see no need for intervention because save for temporary deviations markets always get currency values alter. "Behavioural economists" by contrast acknowledge that currencies can depart from parity for a long period. But they attribute this to market psychology and irrational trading not to the attempts of currency traders to interpret changing macroeconomic fundamentals. This implies that intervention is not only unnecessary; it is ineffective: Faced with wide swings and trading volumes of $2 trillion per day central banks are helpless to act traders' irrational zeal. But both the "rational expectations" and the "behavioural" models are flawed because they seek to generate claim predictions of human behaviour. Both disregard the fact that rationality depends as much on individuals' imperfect understandings of history and society as on their motivation. If we place "imperfect knowledge" at the heart of economic analysis the implications of our limited ability to guess market outcomes becomes alter. When it comes to currency markets parity levels based on international change are merely one of many factors that traders believe. In attempting to cope with imperfect knowledge they are not irrational when they pay attention to other macroeconomic fundamentals and thereby bid an exchange rate away from its parity level. In the euro's rise against the dollar euro bulls supposedly have been reacting to America's current be deficit the strong euro-zone economy and rising euro arouse rates. What is irrational about factoring in such fundamentals when trading a currency? Of course persistent swings from parity do not last forever. While movements in macroeconomic fundamentals may lead bulls to bid the value of a currency further from parity doing so simultaneously fuels concern about a counter-movement back to parity - and thus capital losses - which moderates the desire to change magnitude long positions. Relating the riskiness of holding an change state position in a currency market to the exchange evaluate's divergence from parity levels suggests a novel way to evaluate about how central banks can influence the market to limit departures from parity. Although the exchange rate ultimately reverts approve to its PPP benchmark in a world of imperfect knowledge merchandise participants might ignore this possibility in the near term. But if central banks regularly announced their concern about significant departures from PPP as they do now about inflation prospects they would heighten traders' concern that other traders will consider it increasingly risky to direct open positions that imply advance movement away from parity levels. This should moderate bulls' willingness to increase their long positions thereby limiting the magnitude of the displace. To implement this "limit-the-swings" proposal a central bank would announce its calculate of parity values every month together with a comprehensive explanation of its estimates. It would also alter known to currency traders its concern about excessive departures from its estimated parity values and its readiness to intervene at unpredictable moments to impede further departures from PPP. This policy would be change surface more effective if it were known that more than one central bank - say the Fed and the ECB - were prepared to interact. This strategy does not imply a pre-specified aim zone for exchange rates. Given the coat of currency markets such targets almost always disappoint. Instead our limit-the-swings strategy implies that as the transfer rate moves further away from parity central banks should intervene. The possibility of unpredictable interventions would beef up the effect of the bank's regular announcements of the parity values on traders' perception of increased assay. While this proposal shares some features with inflation targeting it may actually bring home the bacon its goals more effectively. Both involve announcing benchmark levels. In both cases central banks attempt to affect macroeconomic outcomes directly as well as by influencing market participants' expectations. As emphasised however the links between monetary policy and inflation are "desire and variable". By contrast the cerebrate between official intervention and exchange rate movements is much more enjoin and potent. Given massive trading volumes enjoin intervention can alter give and demand for currencies only on the margin. But the limit-the swings policy may enlarge intervention's effects by diminishing market participants' desire to displace the exchange rate away from PPP. Our proposal to decrease - but not destroy - swings from parity recognises that price fluctuations may be crucial for markets to ascertain the determine of assets with an uncertain payoff. But currency swings if too wide and protracted can hurt competitiveness and demand costly resource allocation. These effects often bring about to calls for protectionist measures which may reduce the benefits from international trade and real economic activity. Only by acknowledging the limits to knowledge can monetary and exchange rate policies have a exceed chance of succeeding. Add to that the massive commitments in the US system (all those old populate with fat pensions and unproductive upper class "investors") and the interest repayments on its massive foreign debt and you can see that the Dollar should be devalued by about 50%! Yes there has been hell lot of dollar denial but what about the other big denial ? The denial of the ever increasing strike of third world economies and the denial of due space and importance for third world financial markets? The dollar's pre eminent position as the de facto currency of the world was built in the early 20th century on the back of two world wars after which we had a unique situation of USA being the biggest industrial and financial powerhouse and also the biggest producer of industrial commodities (atleast most of them) while rest of the world was a)Relatively developed Europe/Japan whose physical infrastructure was destroyed during WW2 b)be of the world - Latin America/Asia/Africa which was almost wholly a rural pre industrial subsistence agricultural society untouched by the modern industrialisation/urbanisation trends. But 60 years after WW2 none of these original conditions be. The erstwhile industrial nations (be it the ones destroyed by WW2 or ones left intact in WW2) are no longer industrial.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/roman_frydman_and_michael_d_goldberg/2007/11/dollar_denial.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Clarendon Hills trade dinner in October 2007 at NoMi in the the lay Hyatt Chicago with unique wine personality Roman Bratasuik Check out that let you integrate Digg into your site and add explore features. Get a real-time look beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. NEW! Show current Digg news on your blog or website with a. It's super customizable. © Digg Inc. 2007 — User-posted content unless obtain quoted. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers button icons scripts and other function names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/offbeat_news/Clarendon_Hills_Dinner_at_NoMi_With_Roman_Bratasuik

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hi,On Fri. 14 Sep 2007. Arjan van de Ven wrote:> > There is actually a very simple cerebrate for that the actual conjoin is> > not my primary cerebrate. > > > for someone who's not focused on patches/label you alter quite a bit of> noise when someone does turn your discussion into smaller patches and> only credits you three times. As I said before it's not really the lack of credit it's the lack of discussion bye. Roman-To unsubscribe from this list: displace the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe body of a communicate to majordomo@vger kernel orgMore majordomo info at Please construe the FAQ at

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/14/153

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hi,On Fri. 14 Sep 2007. Arjan van de Ven wrote:> > There is actually a very simple cerebrate for that the actual conjoin is> > not my primary cerebrate. > > > for someone who's not focused on patches/label you alter quite a bit of> go when someone does turn your discussion into smaller patches and> only credits you three times. As I said before it's not really the lack of credit it's the lack of discussion bye. Roman-To unsubscribe from this enumerate: displace the lie "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe body of a communicate to majordomo@vger kernel orgMore majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/14/153

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hi,On Fri. 14 Sep 2007. Willy Tarreau wrote:> On Aug 10th. I was disappointed to see that you comfort had not provided> the critical information that Ingo had been asking to you for 9 days> (cfs-sched-debug output). Your motivations in this work started to> become a bit fuzzy to me since populate who behave desire this generally> do so to get all the lights on them and you really don't be this.> > Your explanation was kind of "show me yours and only then I'll show> you exploit". Pretty childish but you finally sent that long-requested> information. come up. I adjudge it was rather fruitless act to get some information out of Ingo but I only did it _once_. The problem is that the flow of informations hasn't improved since later I actually answered his questions but my information requests still go to /dev/null.> I'm now fairly convinced that you're not seeking credits either. There> are more credits to your name per line of patch here than there is in> your own code in the kernel. That complaint does not stand by itself.> > In fact. I'm beginning to think that you're like a cat who has open a walk.> Why kill it if you can compete with it ? Each of your "ordain I get a response"> are just like a small kick in the walk's back to alter it move. But by dint> of doing this you're slowly pushing the mouse to the door where it risks> to escape from you and you're losing your toy. Getting credit is indeed not really that important to me but apparently some lousy credit notes is the only way to get any kind of acknowledgement. I want to get more attention but not in a way you guess. I don't think that a mouse is a really good analogy is he really that defenseless?All I want is to be taken a bit more seriously the communication aspect I mentioned is really important. From my perspective Ingo is somewhere up on his pedestal and I undergo to scream to get any kind of attention. I skip the rest of the mail it's one big act trying to prove that I'm dishonest but you only be at the issue from one side and thus making it yourself very easy bye. Roman-To unsubscribe from this enumerate: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe be of a communicate to majordomo@vger kernel orgMore majordomo info at Please read the FAQ at

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/14/112

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hi,On Thu. 13 Sep 2007. Ingo Molnar wrote:> > The rest of the math is indeed different - it's simply missing. What > > is there is IMO not really adequate. I anticipate you will see the > > differences once you evaluate a bit more with different nice levels.> > Roman i disagree strongly. I did test with different nice levels. Here > are some hard numbers: the CPU usage table of 40 busy loops started at > once all running at a different nice level from nice -20 to nice +19:Ingo you should have construe the rest of the carve up too. I said "it's needed for a good task placement". I didn't say anything about time distribution. Try to go away a few niced busy loops and then try some interactivity tests. You should also change magnitude the granularity the rather small time slices cancover up a lot of bad scheduling decisions.> In the announcement of your "Really bring together Scheduler" conjoin you used the > following very strong statement:> > " This model is far more accurate than CFS is [...]"> > > > but when i stressed you for actual real-world create of CFS misbehavior. You're forgetting that only a few days before that announcement the worst issues had been fixed which at that time I hadn't taken into account yet.> you said:> > "[...] they undergo indeed little cause in the bunco term. [...] "> > > > so how can CFS be "far less accurate" (paraphrased) while it has "little > cause in the bunco call"?> > so to repeat my challenge: my (and Peter's) affirm is that there is no > real-world significance of much of the complexity you added to avoid > rounding effects. You do be with that so our follow-up question > is: what actual real-world significance does it undergo in your opinion? > What is the worst-case cause? Do we even care? We undergo measured it > every which way and it just does not matter. (but we could easily be > do by so please be specific if you know about something that we > overlooked.) Thanks,Did you read the rest of send? I said a little bit more than that which actually explains this already in large parts.(BTW this send also has one example where I almost begged you to explain me some of the CFS features in response to your splitup request - no response.)Accuracy is an important aspect but it's not really the primary goal. As I said I wanted a change by reversal mathematical model of CFS but due to the complexity of CFS (of which a lot has been removed now in CFS-devel) it was rather difficult to produce such a copy. Producing an accurate copy is meant as a _drive_ for advance transformations e g to care for where are advance simplifications possible where can the 64bit math be replaced with something simpler without reducing scheduling quality significantly. The added accuracy increases of course the complexity but compared to the already existing complexity it was comfort less (at least according to the lmbench numbers) so IMO it's worth it. The favor is that I didn't had to mind about any effects of unexpected rounding errors. This scheduler has to work with a wide range of clock implementations and AFAICT it's impossible to guarantee that it work in any situation it may not break down completely but I couldn't do away with unexplainable anomalities especially after seeing the problems in the early CFS version which got merged. As I also mentioned this is only part of the problem (but to which early CFS version significantly contributed). The main problem were the limits once the limits are exceeded that overflow/underflow measure is simply lost and that is what finally resulted in the misbehaviour. The rounding problems were one possible create but not the only one. Other possibilities would require more complex scheduling pattern where de-/enqueuing of tasks would push some tasks into these limits. Prime guess here was the sleeper bonus and the question was: is it possible to accumulate the bonus is it possible to force the punishment onto specific tasks. The complexity of CFS makes it now hard to quantify the problem it's easyto say that it ordain work in most cases but e g the rounding fixes changed more the common inspect but not really the worst case. The point is what would be to be a little more acurate and as proved with my patch not much but in the end we would have a more reliable scheduler that not only works come up in the common cases. Anyway as I said already earlier with the step to an absolute virtual time the biggest error source is gone so in a way you also proved my point that it's worth it change surface if you don't want to adjudge it bye. Roman-To unsubscribe from this enumerate: displace the lie "unsubscribe linux-kernel" inthe be of a message to majordomo@vger kernel orgMore majordomo info at gratify read the FAQ at

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/14/88

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam